"The ironic, enduring legacy of banning 'To Kill a Mockingbird' for racist language'
1. The text engaged with reason and emotion by presenting the opposing sides in the controversy surrounding the banning of 'To Kill a Mockingbird'. On one side, reason engages with the issue in the sense that there are people who emotionally overlook the use of racial slurs because they know that the book was written in another time period, and therefore, that it can make us uncomfortable now but has a lot to teach us. Logically, they overlook the emotional hinderances that language can pose to learning, and rather, decide to look at the book as art that perfectly captures racism in America in the 30's. They see the book as a vehicle for understanding America's racist past better, and henceforth, utilize it as a means of reflection and solutions to America's present ongoing racist nature. On the other hand, emotion engages with this through art as a way of knowing. Those who feel uncomfortable by the use of racial slurs want to ban it because they are stirring the...